A roboticist built a hardware aimbot that could outrun the pros, until he aimed so hard he died

first sighted by hackadayan industrious robot builder, Kamal Carter, created a physical aimbot that will visually scan a computer screen and then physically move a mouse to click on targets, and it’s good enough to beat some Valorant pros in crosshair training software. Or couldbefore his brief chance for esports glory was extinguished.

Aimbotting is most typically accomplished through software, removing our unreliable meat space reflexes from the equation so we can click heads with relentless machine precision. It’s a major bugbear of competitive FPS games, with its supposed use by opponents second only to FPS players’ own teammates as the most cited reason for losing a game. Cheating software can be a real problem, widespread enough for developers to invest in anti-cheat solutions or expensive cool campaigns against their creators to preserve the competitive integrity of their games.

To make his physical aimbot, Carter designed a chassis with four omnidirectional wheels made to fit around a wireless mouse. This box takes instructions from a program that can analyze visual data, allowing the physical aimbot to react to on-screen events the same way a human would.

Carter tested the device in a targeting training program called Aim Lab, which provides an objective measure of its effectiveness, as well as distinct targets in a sparse environment to calibrate the program. Over the course of two months of work, Carter was able to get the aimbot to track targets quickly and smoothly without overshooting.

An average gamer can expect an Aim Lab score of 40-50,000, while professional FPS players can guarantee one in the 80-90,000 range. Carter was able to achieve a high score in Aim Lab’s 118,494 with the robot. He hoped to further develop the small FPS terminator and potentially challenge the Valorant pro tenz maximum score in Aim Lab, which was 138,944 when the video was made and it has since risen to 146,902.

Unfortunately, the little robot took aim too hard and one of its engines failed, putting an end to Carter’s search for the time being. In his own words: “In this battle between robots and people, people ended up winning.”

Still, it’s a great story, and there’s something admirably whimsical about deliberately taking the hard way into something so easily accomplished in software. Paying $30 a month for a computer program that likely mines bitcoin in the background is one thing, but going to the trouble of months of work to create a literal robot to play for you? This is art.

Leave a Comment